Generic risk management was not written for power

Off-the-shelf enterprise risk management treats an energy project like any other balance-sheet item. It is not. An energy asset’s value is moved by forces a generic GRC model never sees: the power market (price, volatility, basis, capture, curtailment), the grid (connection, maturity, capacity), the regulation (REMIT/MAR, NEM, CACM, EBGL, FCAGL, EED, RED III, EU ETS), and the physics of the asset itself. Miss those, and the risk register describes a company that does not exist.

MeginLeid’s risk management starts from the opposite end — the market — and reads every asset through it.

One recognised spine, one source of truth

ISO 31000 risk management framework — Principles (clause 4), Framework (clause 5) and Process (clause 6)

Technology-agnostic — including the combinations

The same framework applies whatever sits on the site:

Hydrogen · Data centres · Battery storage (BESS) · Wind · Solar PV · Hydropower

— and, increasingly, combinations on a single site: PV paired with storage, a flexible load co-located with generation, hydrogen alongside a data centre. The risk profile combines as the technologies combine; one framework holds the whole asset, not a folder per technology.

A power-trader’s lens

The work is led by a former power trader. That means risk is read the way the market reads it — decomposed, explicit, and resolved to clear choices — and priced against where value actually sits, not where a template expects it.

Engage

Risk advisory for energy assets — from a single project to a multi-site portfolio.

Heine Rønningen · MeginLeid AS · [email protected]